Building seawalls around high-traffic coastal areas such as piers, boardwalks, and beachfronts often can provide suitable protection from storm surges, but this added security can entail a social cost.
In many cases, seawalls obstruct ocean views. Even worse, while seawalls may confine floodwaters to the beach, they also can restrict convenient ocean access by pedestrians when storm-surge risks are low. Coastal flood managers considering seawalls often must balance the value of flood protection with the recreational and economic value of beach tourism.
Ongoing research by Princeton University (New Jersey) engineers may offer a solution. By borrowing concepts from architectural design, the engineers are testing a new type of seawall that would both enhance the pedestrian experience during normal weather conditions as well as provide sufficient flood protection during high tides and heavy storms.
“This is so much more than just your typical coastal defensive structure,” said Shengzhe Wang, a Princeton civil and environmental engineering researcher and lead author of a new article about the design, said in a release. “It’s the first time that anyone has really tried to integrate architecture as an inherent component to a coastal countermeasure.”
Offering Shade and Security
Most of the time, the Princeton team’s design would resemble a saddle – a structure that curves inward along one axis and outward along the other, known as a hyperbolic paraboloid or hypar. Instead of obstructing ocean views, the inactive seawalls would rest on thin columns, and provide shade and shelter to beachside pedestrian walkways.
However, in advance of heavy storms that could intensify coastal flood risks, a hinge at the point where the column meets the barrier would enable the structure to pivot into place as a coastal countermeasure. In an article detailing computer-modeled, structural stress-testing results, the researchers describe that a series of sensors and actuators could enable communities to operate the seawalls remotely, or even program them to pivot automatically when the forecast calls for storms. The article appears in the Journal of Structural Engineering.
Each section of the barrier would consist of 10-cm-thick (4-in.-thick) reinforced concrete shells measuring about 8 m (26 ft) on each side, according to the article. The columns, each measuring about 3-m-high (10-ft-high), would be tall enough to provide ample shade and make vandalizing the shells difficult, said co-author Maria Garlock, Princeton professor of civil and environmental engineering, in the statement.
“These shells are so thin that anyone looking at this would not be inclined to believe that these structures would be capable of stopping such large forces from water,” Garlock said. “But we’re able to take advantage of the geometry of the hypar shape that gives the structure the additional strength that’s required.”
Using computer simulations, the project team operationalized more than a century of storm-surge data from across the U.S. East Coast to model the performance of the hypar structures against real-world hurricanes and other major storms. Standard measures for estimating fluid-structure interaction showed that the structures would remain stable against water levels up to about 75% of their deployed height, according to the study.
From Rooftops to Beachfronts
The Princeton team is not the first to draw inspiration from the unique hypar shape.
Spanish architect Felix Candela became famous for using the hypar, along with several other unconventional shapes, as the basis for hundreds of thin-shelled rooftops in Mexico during the 1950s and 1960s. Candela’s designs were in mind while designing the team’s seawalls, explained Garlock. She previously co-authored a book about Candela and helped create an archive at Princeton exploring the architect’s work.
In rooftops, as in seawalls, the hypar shape efficiently distributes weight stress and exposure throughout the structure when properly supported. The lightweight structure offers strong resistance against cracks, fractures, and long-term temperature effects.
“This is a completely new way of thinking about coastal defense structures,” Garlock said.
After testing the theoretical design using simulations, the Princeton team now is continuing the development and analysis process. Researchers have created a small-scale model of the hypar seawall measuring about 15 cm (6 in.) in diameter, which they will pit against the combined forces of water and wind using a miniature water channel and wind tunnel, Wang said. The team also is exploring the possibility of using more sustainable materials for the structures as well as incorporating systems that would capture solar energy and stormwater runoff.
“In reality, you’re not going to just have a pile of static water. You’re going to have waves. You’re going to have wind that generates those waves,” Wang said. “That’s what we’re trying to capture in our next step: How do we physically simulate these waves and how would these waves affect our structures?”
ABOUT THE AUTHOR
Justin Jacques is editor of Stormwater Report and a staff member of the Water Environment Federation (WEF). In addition to writing for WEF’s online publications, he also contributes to Water Environment & Technology magazine. Contact him at jjacques@wef.org.
What mechanism will be able to turn long distances of these shells from horizontal to vertical? How do you assure a seal between shell sections? What assures that there is no debris on the surface the shells will settle on? Consider that debris may fall from the top of the shells onto the contact surface during the process of lowering the shells. What effort is required for testing the mechanisms regularly?
Most importantly, I assume that the shell were designed and will probably work for static water pressure, even wave action. However, what happens when tree trunks or boats are battered against the shells?
Cont.
“Walking in its shade” and having the hinges high enough to “prevent vandalism” result in a minimum height of this structure of about 20 feet. Presumably this would also be a maximum height, otherwise the structure would look more like an elevated freeway section. I am not sure how many application are out there for a 20-ft seawall.
Rudolf listed many of my first thoughts as I read the article. This concept needs to evolve quite a bit before it enters the realm of practical engineering. We will be interested to see the results from the 6-inch tall scale model. Keep dreaming big Princeton.